B"H
Dvarim (Deuteronomy) Ch. 3:25-26 read:
אעברה נא ואראה את הארץ הטובה אשר בעבר הירדן...
...ויאמר ה' אלי רב לך אל תוסף דבר אלי עוד בדבר הזה
Loosely translated:
[Moshe beseeches Hashem, pleading with him:] Please let me cross over to see the good land that is on the other side of the Jordan river...
...And Hashem said to me: "You had enough! Do not continue to ask this thing of me."
The context that this exchange is in is Moshe pleading for permission to enter the Holy Land, but his requests are denied.
The question is why did Hashem say that Moshe had enough? Enough of what?
An interesting insight into this can be gained if we consider what King David wrote in the book of Psalms 90:10:
ימי שנותינו בהם שבעים שנה
Loosely translated:
The alloted days of our lives is 70 years.
If King David says that we're all alloted 70 years then why is it that certain people live longer lives or others, G-d forbid, do the opposite?
The answer is (as is explained in a number of places) that a person's merits (or that of his/her ancestors) may extend his/her lifespan (=bonus extension). The opposite is also true. Nonetheless, a person gets a 70-year quota by default (and it's subject to change.)
Moshe, pleading with Hashem on Mt. Nevo is at the last days of his life. He was already informed that he's not going to enter the land of Israel and that indeed his burial place is in the wilderness. Moshe is 120 years old at that point.
So, taking King David's assertions that a person gets 70 years, it turns out that Moshe is 70 years old, plus a 50 year extension Moshe says to Hashem:
אעברה נא ואראה את הארץ הטובה
Which was loosely translated at as "Let me please cross [the Jordan river] so that I shall see the Good Land", however it can also be rendered as: "Let me cross נא so that I shall see the Good Land." What is נא? Aside from "Please" it also has the numerical value of 51. Moshe in effect is asking Hashem: "Please let me cross into the 51'st year of my bonus, that is allow me to live into my 121'st year, and therefore I shall be able to see the good land."
Hashem's answer: "רב לך"
Which was loosely translated as "You had enough", however it can also be rendered as: "לך is enough." What is לך? Aside from "You" it also has the numerical value of 50. Hashem in effect is answering to Moshe: "Fifty is enough. You're 50 year bonus is plenty. You will not live into your 121'st year."
The Midrash says that Moshe pleaded with Hashem over 500 times to enter the land and was refused every single time, until Hashem finally, explicitly and unequivocally told him to continue to ask no more, in verse 26.
A lesson for all of us: when it comes to matters of holiness one should never give up.
But Moshe's passing in the wilderness serves another lesson: Moshe being the loyal and devoted shepherd that he was will never leave behind his flock. He is buried in the desert together with the entire generation that left Egypt. Moshe will still lead them into the Holy Land of Israel at the end of days (the time of resurrection) just as he set out to do -- speedily in our days.
Showing posts with label Moshe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Moshe. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 24, 2007
Wednesday, July 18, 2007
Moshe did not answer
B"H
We find four occurrences at in the book of Bamidbar (Numbers) that seem to stand out (from all of scripture) in that Moshe was either unable or unwilling to answer questions put to him.
We find the first occurrence in Bamidbar (Numbers) Ch. 25:6 which reads:
והמה בכים פתח אהל מועד
Loosely translated:
(When Zimri brought the Midianite women, before Moshe and the entire congregation) they were all crying by the opening of the Tent of Meeting.
Rashi brings a midrash about the reason they were crying:
Zimri brought the Midianite women to Moshe and asked him: "Am I permitted to marry this woman or not? And should you say 'no', who permitted Tziporah to you?!?" Moshe was silent.
We find the second occurrence in Bamidbar (Numbers) Ch. 27:4-5, which read:
למה יגרע שם אבינו מתוך משפחתו כי אין לו בן תנה לנו אחזה בתוך אחי אבינו
ויקרב משה את משפטן לפני השם
Loosely translated:
(The daughters of Tzlofchad came to Moshe and made the following argument:) Why must the name of our father be removed from his family as he has no sons. Give us a portion of land amongst our Father's brothers.
And Moshe brought their claim to the Almighty.
Rashi again brings the midrash: The daughters of Tzlfchad made the following statement to Moshe: our father was killed for a private sin (=violation of Shabbat). He was not part of Korach's followers and he did not commit trison aginst you. Why must he be punished in the same manner as Korach and his gang by loosing his portion of the land of Israel?!?!
Here again, Moshe did not answer on his own. He went to Hashem to get guidance.
We find the third occurrence in Bamidbar (Numbers) Ch. 36:2-3,6, which read:
ויאמרו את אדני צוה השם לתת את הארץ בנחלה בגורל לבני ישראל ואדני צֻוָּה בהשם לתת את נחלת צלפחד אחינו לבנתיו
...ומגרל נחלתנו יגרע
זה הדבר אשר צוה השם לבנות צלפחד לאמר, לטוב בעיניהם תהיינה לנשים
Loosely translated:
The tribe of Menashe came to Moshe arguing as follows: Our master (=Moshe) was commanded by the Almighty to portion the land amongst the Jews and our master was further commanded by the Almighty to give the portion of Tzlofchad our brother to his daughters.... and our portion be reduced (when they get married to someone from a different tribe)... Moshe (consulted Hashem and said this is what Hashem commanded to the daughers of Tzlofchad: they shall marry who they desire (so long as they are from the same tribe, thereby not reducing the total portion of the tribe.)
Here again, Moshe did not answer on his own. He went to Hashem to get guidance.
Lastly, with a bit of time-travel we find the fourth occurrence in Bamidbar (Numbers) Ch. 9:7-8, which reads:
ויאמרו האנשים ההמה אליו אנחנו טמאים לנפש אדם למה נגרע לבלתי הקריב את קרבן יהוה במעדו בתוך בני ישראל
ויאמר אלהם משה עמדו ואשמעה מה יצוה השם לכם
Loosely translated:
(The people from the burial society came to Moshe) and they said: We are defiled with the impurity of death, why should we loose-out by not being able to bring the Pascal sacrifice at the right time with the rest of the Jews?
And Moshe said to them: stand here while I hear what Hashem shall command for you to do.
Evidently, here again Moshe did not answer on his own. He went to Hashem to get guidance.
Obviously the common thread here is that Moshe didn't answer directly when a question was posed to him. Why?!?!
To refine the question, let us look at the following:
In the first instance, Moshe could have answered very simply as follows: Tziporah was permitted to me because 1) we were married before the receiving the Torah and its prohibitions against marrying Midianites, 2) she accepted upon her the yolke of heaven, in other words, she converted.
In the second instance, Moshe could have also answered the daughters of Tzlofchad. The subject matter that we're dealing with here is not a very complicated issue in the laws of inheritance. And Moshe certainly knew the laws pertaining to this situation. He could have paskened (=make a rulling) himself.
In the third instance, Moshe could have replied the very same way without consulting with Hashem, for the answer was very straight-forward. He could have paskened again, on his own.
In the fourth instance (which happens to have occurred first, chronologically) Moshe could have come up with some answer himself. It may be somewhat unlikely that he would have commanded a Second Passover (which is what Hashem commanded) but nonetheless he didn't even try to answer.
Yes in all four instances, Moshe did not answer and did not pasken... Evidently, he was either unwilling or unable....
What's going on?
An explanation:
If we examine closely what transpired in the first two instances we will understand what caused Moshe's inhibition. We will then be able to extrapolate to the last two instances.
In the first instance Zimri ask Moshe a question. But before even giving Moshe the opportunity to answer he also offered criticism (or even an accusation.) Moshe surly had a very good answer (as stated above), but he abstained from presenting it. Had Moshe answered, an outside observer might have concluded that Moshe is attempting to defend his actions in order to maintain authority. In other words Moshe's answer might have been misinterpreted as trying to safeguard his personal interests, G-d forbid.
Moshe then, decided not to give a legal ruling and leave the matter to others, lest it be misinterpreted. Moshe did not want to be involved under these circumstances.
In the second instance the daughters of Tzlofchad came and asked for a legal ruling from Moshe, but along with the problem-statement they also added that their Father was not in the camp of Korach. Had they simply made a she'ela (presented their case and seeked advise) Moshe would have been very likely to give them ruling (as stated above). However, once they mentioned that their father was not on Korach's side (i.e., he was on Moshe's side) Moshe was no longer willing to give them a ruling. Had Moshe paskended a ruling, to an outside observer it may have been misinterpreted as if the daughters of Tzlofchad bribed Moshe to receive their father's portion. In other words, an outside oberserver may have misinterpreted Moshe's answer as a pay-back for their father's support, G-d forbid.
Again, Moshe decided not to give a legal ruling under these circumstances, lest it be misinterpreted. Instead he left it to Hashem to answer.
So, we see how great a leader Moshe was! In either cases, he could have answered and ruled, and yet when there's even a tiny chance that his actions may be misinterpreted he removed himself from the situation and deferred to others. Moshe's integrity is exemplary to the nth degree.
We can now also understand what happened in the last two instances:
In the instnace of the tribe of Menashe approaching Moshe regarding the ruling on the matter of the daughters of Tzlofchad: even though the ruling came from Above, and the matter at hand is only a derivative of the original matter, Moshe told the tribe of Menash: "I cannot hand this file. Because the genesis of this file was not for me to handle, I will not touch it even now." Again, Moshe demonstrating exemplary integrity.
In the last instance of the burial society approaching Moshe because they did not want to loose out on the very special Pascal sacrifice: there are varying opinions as to why their were ritually impure. According to one option they were impure at that point in time because they just handled the burial of Datan and Aviran. According to a different option they were impure because their were carrying the bones of Yosef to the Land of Israel.
If we go with the opinion that the burial society was impure due to handling Datan and Aviran's (i.e., Moshe's nephews') burial, had Moshe benefited the burial society in any way (such as ruling for them a second Passover), an out side observer may have misinterpreted this as payback for their services. In other words, in may have been misinterpreted as Moshe having vested interest in their actions.
If we go with the second option that the burial society was impure due to handling Yosef's bones, had Moshe benefited the burial society in any way, an outside observer may have misinterpreted this as payback for doing Moshe's work for him -- Moshe was handling Yosef's bones at first, and had given the task over to the burial society. Again, Moshe's ruling may have been misinterpreted as a form of payback.
All in all we get a glimpse into Moshe's personality and leadership, specifically by what he wasn't saying. His abstention from matters that may have had a tiny chance of being misconstrued is a true testament of his character and integrity as the proto-leader of the Jewish nation.
Please G-d may we merit many more leaders in Moshe's image, speedily!
Good Shabbos.
We find four occurrences at in the book of Bamidbar (Numbers) that seem to stand out (from all of scripture) in that Moshe was either unable or unwilling to answer questions put to him.
We find the first occurrence in Bamidbar (Numbers) Ch. 25:6 which reads:
והמה בכים פתח אהל מועד
Loosely translated:
(When Zimri brought the Midianite women, before Moshe and the entire congregation) they were all crying by the opening of the Tent of Meeting.
Rashi brings a midrash about the reason they were crying:
Zimri brought the Midianite women to Moshe and asked him: "Am I permitted to marry this woman or not? And should you say 'no', who permitted Tziporah to you?!?" Moshe was silent.
We find the second occurrence in Bamidbar (Numbers) Ch. 27:4-5, which read:
למה יגרע שם אבינו מתוך משפחתו כי אין לו בן תנה לנו אחזה בתוך אחי אבינו
ויקרב משה את משפטן לפני השם
Loosely translated:
(The daughters of Tzlofchad came to Moshe and made the following argument:) Why must the name of our father be removed from his family as he has no sons. Give us a portion of land amongst our Father's brothers.
And Moshe brought their claim to the Almighty.
Rashi again brings the midrash: The daughters of Tzlfchad made the following statement to Moshe: our father was killed for a private sin (=violation of Shabbat). He was not part of Korach's followers and he did not commit trison aginst you. Why must he be punished in the same manner as Korach and his gang by loosing his portion of the land of Israel?!?!
Here again, Moshe did not answer on his own. He went to Hashem to get guidance.
We find the third occurrence in Bamidbar (Numbers) Ch. 36:2-3,6, which read:
ויאמרו את אדני צוה השם לתת את הארץ בנחלה בגורל לבני ישראל ואדני צֻוָּה בהשם לתת את נחלת צלפחד אחינו לבנתיו
...ומגרל נחלתנו יגרע
זה הדבר אשר צוה השם לבנות צלפחד לאמר, לטוב בעיניהם תהיינה לנשים
Loosely translated:
The tribe of Menashe came to Moshe arguing as follows: Our master (=Moshe) was commanded by the Almighty to portion the land amongst the Jews and our master was further commanded by the Almighty to give the portion of Tzlofchad our brother to his daughters.... and our portion be reduced (when they get married to someone from a different tribe)... Moshe (consulted Hashem and said this is what Hashem commanded to the daughers of Tzlofchad: they shall marry who they desire (so long as they are from the same tribe, thereby not reducing the total portion of the tribe.)
Here again, Moshe did not answer on his own. He went to Hashem to get guidance.
Lastly, with a bit of time-travel we find the fourth occurrence in Bamidbar (Numbers) Ch. 9:7-8, which reads:
ויאמרו האנשים ההמה אליו אנחנו טמאים לנפש אדם למה נגרע לבלתי הקריב את קרבן יהוה במעדו בתוך בני ישראל
ויאמר אלהם משה עמדו ואשמעה מה יצוה השם לכם
Loosely translated:
(The people from the burial society came to Moshe) and they said: We are defiled with the impurity of death, why should we loose-out by not being able to bring the Pascal sacrifice at the right time with the rest of the Jews?
And Moshe said to them: stand here while I hear what Hashem shall command for you to do.
Evidently, here again Moshe did not answer on his own. He went to Hashem to get guidance.
Obviously the common thread here is that Moshe didn't answer directly when a question was posed to him. Why?!?!
To refine the question, let us look at the following:
In the first instance, Moshe could have answered very simply as follows: Tziporah was permitted to me because 1) we were married before the receiving the Torah and its prohibitions against marrying Midianites, 2) she accepted upon her the yolke of heaven, in other words, she converted.
In the second instance, Moshe could have also answered the daughters of Tzlofchad. The subject matter that we're dealing with here is not a very complicated issue in the laws of inheritance. And Moshe certainly knew the laws pertaining to this situation. He could have paskened (=make a rulling) himself.
In the third instance, Moshe could have replied the very same way without consulting with Hashem, for the answer was very straight-forward. He could have paskened again, on his own.
In the fourth instance (which happens to have occurred first, chronologically) Moshe could have come up with some answer himself. It may be somewhat unlikely that he would have commanded a Second Passover (which is what Hashem commanded) but nonetheless he didn't even try to answer.
Yes in all four instances, Moshe did not answer and did not pasken... Evidently, he was either unwilling or unable....
What's going on?
An explanation:
If we examine closely what transpired in the first two instances we will understand what caused Moshe's inhibition. We will then be able to extrapolate to the last two instances.
In the first instance Zimri ask Moshe a question. But before even giving Moshe the opportunity to answer he also offered criticism (or even an accusation.) Moshe surly had a very good answer (as stated above), but he abstained from presenting it. Had Moshe answered, an outside observer might have concluded that Moshe is attempting to defend his actions in order to maintain authority. In other words Moshe's answer might have been misinterpreted as trying to safeguard his personal interests, G-d forbid.
Moshe then, decided not to give a legal ruling and leave the matter to others, lest it be misinterpreted. Moshe did not want to be involved under these circumstances.
In the second instance the daughters of Tzlofchad came and asked for a legal ruling from Moshe, but along with the problem-statement they also added that their Father was not in the camp of Korach. Had they simply made a she'ela (presented their case and seeked advise) Moshe would have been very likely to give them ruling (as stated above). However, once they mentioned that their father was not on Korach's side (i.e., he was on Moshe's side) Moshe was no longer willing to give them a ruling. Had Moshe paskended a ruling, to an outside observer it may have been misinterpreted as if the daughters of Tzlofchad bribed Moshe to receive their father's portion. In other words, an outside oberserver may have misinterpreted Moshe's answer as a pay-back for their father's support, G-d forbid.
Again, Moshe decided not to give a legal ruling under these circumstances, lest it be misinterpreted. Instead he left it to Hashem to answer.
So, we see how great a leader Moshe was! In either cases, he could have answered and ruled, and yet when there's even a tiny chance that his actions may be misinterpreted he removed himself from the situation and deferred to others. Moshe's integrity is exemplary to the nth degree.
We can now also understand what happened in the last two instances:
In the instnace of the tribe of Menashe approaching Moshe regarding the ruling on the matter of the daughters of Tzlofchad: even though the ruling came from Above, and the matter at hand is only a derivative of the original matter, Moshe told the tribe of Menash: "I cannot hand this file. Because the genesis of this file was not for me to handle, I will not touch it even now." Again, Moshe demonstrating exemplary integrity.
In the last instance of the burial society approaching Moshe because they did not want to loose out on the very special Pascal sacrifice: there are varying opinions as to why their were ritually impure. According to one option they were impure at that point in time because they just handled the burial of Datan and Aviran. According to a different option they were impure because their were carrying the bones of Yosef to the Land of Israel.
If we go with the opinion that the burial society was impure due to handling Datan and Aviran's (i.e., Moshe's nephews') burial, had Moshe benefited the burial society in any way (such as ruling for them a second Passover), an out side observer may have misinterpreted this as payback for their services. In other words, in may have been misinterpreted as Moshe having vested interest in their actions.
If we go with the second option that the burial society was impure due to handling Yosef's bones, had Moshe benefited the burial society in any way, an outside observer may have misinterpreted this as payback for doing Moshe's work for him -- Moshe was handling Yosef's bones at first, and had given the task over to the burial society. Again, Moshe's ruling may have been misinterpreted as a form of payback.
All in all we get a glimpse into Moshe's personality and leadership, specifically by what he wasn't saying. His abstention from matters that may have had a tiny chance of being misconstrued is a true testament of his character and integrity as the proto-leader of the Jewish nation.
Please G-d may we merit many more leaders in Moshe's image, speedily!
Good Shabbos.
Sunday, June 3, 2007
Kosher spies vs. Hoshea's name change.
B"H
Bamidbar (Numbers) Ch.13:3 reads:
כלם אנשים ראשי בני ישראל המה
Loosely translated:
There were all אנשים (pron.: Anashim = men), the heads of the Jewish people.
Rashi interprets "Anashim" in 13:3 to mean that at the time of calling there were all kosher righteous individuals, i.e., proper upstanding leaders of the community and of their respective tribes.
Interestingly in 13:16 we find:
ויקרא משה להושע בן-נון יהושע
Loosely translated:
And Moshe renamed Hoshea son of Nun to Yehoshuah (Joshua)
Rashi (on 13:16) states that Moshe added the leading י to Hoshea's name (thus resulting in Yehoshua) so that "Hashem will protect Joshua from the conspiracy of those wicked spies" (referring to the 10 spies are are destined to produce an evil report about the land of Israel.)
So, the obvious question is this: if these 10 men were indeed wicked, why did Moshe call them "Anashim" (=righteous, proper and upstanding leaders of their respective tribes.) Why indeed did he choose them to lead the mission? If on the other hand they were indeed kosher "Anashim", why did Moshe have to add a letter to Hoshea's name to draw down divine protection from these Anashim?
What were they? Anashim or wicked?
At the literal level, we must conclude that they were indeed "Anashim" as the Torah states, which means that they were kosher at the time the were chosen for the mission. So, the question falls back onto Moshe as to his decision to add a letter to a perfectly valid name.
An explanation, but first some background:
We find that there are two types of righteous individuals, as it states in Tehilim (Psalms) 93:13:
צדיק כתמר יפרח כארז בלבנון ישגה
Loosely translated:
A righteous person will grow like a palm-tree, [and] like a Lebanon-ceder tree he shell become great.
What's the differences between a palm-tree and a ceder? A ceder tree is much bigger, wider, stronger, taller and resistant to the elements. It's a really massive tree, especially the Lebanese variety. A palm-tree, on the other hand is smaller, slimmer and shorter and not as resistant. Though a palm-tree posses one very important quality that a ceder lacks: the ability to bear fruit! Not only does a palm-tree produces dates, but anyone who eats those dates gains sustenances, vitality and strength.
This is likened to two types of Tzakdikim (=righteous individuals):
There are those that are like a ceder: they are massive! the devote 100% of themselves to study of Torah and spiritual pursuit. They are constantly in heavenly involvement and absolutly nothing else. Their entire existence evolves around the axis of Torah.
On the other side of the spectrum there are those Tzakdikim that that are like a palm-tree: their not devoting 100% of their time to Torah study. They are not constantly involved with heaven. In fact they devote some of their time, effort, money and abilities to help other people. They bear fruits -- they're actions and interactions with other individuals -- in the way of spiritual and material help are indeed the "fruits" they produce. The palm-tree tzadikim reach out to the simple folk. Those who consume their fruits indeed gain both physical and spiritual sustenance, vitality and strength.
Though this outreach may come at the expense of these palm-tree tzadikim, because they certainly don't have all the Torah study that the ceder tzadikim have.
Back to the problem at hand:
Moshe sees in the 10 other spies that they are indeed kosher, as Rashi explains, and that they're indeed tzadikim of the ceder variety: they much rather stay in the desert and live a supernatural life where food is miraculously provided daily, the clothing grows with the person wearing them, the clouds of glory provide divine protection and a person is free to pursuit spirituality to their heart's content without interference from the physical realm. On the other hand the Land of Israel represents, to them, a spiritual decent because: a person would have to be involved in manual labor to work the land, go to the marketplace to buy and sell, cook, put food on the table, clean after the meal, change diapers, take the donkey in for an oil-change, take the kids to sand-hockey and be otherwise involved in earthy matters, leaving less time for spiritual pursuits.
Moshe wants Hoshea to become a palm-tree tzadik, on the other hand. Moshe reasons that it's not enough to be all spiritual and lead a completely spiritual life, for if that was the case, the Jewish nation would have not received physical bodies and a Torah that affects (and indeed utilizes and refines) the physical world. For Torah to be truly applied in one's day-to-day life, one must infuse the day-to-day mundane life with Torah -- that is the true purpose of receiving the Torah at Mt. Sinai.
Retrospectively we see that Moshe was correct: the 10 spies were punished severely for trying to hijack the divine plan (i.e., to stay in the desert and live an exclusively spiritual life) while Yehoshuah (nee: Hoshea) is chosen by the Almighty as Moshe's replacement and indeed the person who will eventually lead the Jewish people into the Land of Israel. There, in the Land of Israel, under Yehoshua's leadership the Divine Will and Divine Purpose of giving of the Torah (and indeed creation as a whole) can be fulfilled, specifically by affecting, utilizing and refining the mundane with the light of Torah.
Bamidbar (Numbers) Ch.13:3 reads:
כלם אנשים ראשי בני ישראל המה
Loosely translated:
There were all אנשים (pron.: Anashim = men), the heads of the Jewish people.
Rashi interprets "Anashim" in 13:3 to mean that at the time of calling there were all kosher righteous individuals, i.e., proper upstanding leaders of the community and of their respective tribes.
Interestingly in 13:16 we find:
ויקרא משה להושע בן-נון יהושע
Loosely translated:
And Moshe renamed Hoshea son of Nun to Yehoshuah (Joshua)
Rashi (on 13:16) states that Moshe added the leading י to Hoshea's name (thus resulting in Yehoshua) so that "Hashem will protect Joshua from the conspiracy of those wicked spies" (referring to the 10 spies are are destined to produce an evil report about the land of Israel.)
So, the obvious question is this: if these 10 men were indeed wicked, why did Moshe call them "Anashim" (=righteous, proper and upstanding leaders of their respective tribes.) Why indeed did he choose them to lead the mission? If on the other hand they were indeed kosher "Anashim", why did Moshe have to add a letter to Hoshea's name to draw down divine protection from these Anashim?
What were they? Anashim or wicked?
At the literal level, we must conclude that they were indeed "Anashim" as the Torah states, which means that they were kosher at the time the were chosen for the mission. So, the question falls back onto Moshe as to his decision to add a letter to a perfectly valid name.
An explanation, but first some background:
We find that there are two types of righteous individuals, as it states in Tehilim (Psalms) 93:13:
צדיק כתמר יפרח כארז בלבנון ישגה
Loosely translated:
A righteous person will grow like a palm-tree, [and] like a Lebanon-ceder tree he shell become great.
What's the differences between a palm-tree and a ceder? A ceder tree is much bigger, wider, stronger, taller and resistant to the elements. It's a really massive tree, especially the Lebanese variety. A palm-tree, on the other hand is smaller, slimmer and shorter and not as resistant. Though a palm-tree posses one very important quality that a ceder lacks: the ability to bear fruit! Not only does a palm-tree produces dates, but anyone who eats those dates gains sustenances, vitality and strength.
This is likened to two types of Tzakdikim (=righteous individuals):
There are those that are like a ceder: they are massive! the devote 100% of themselves to study of Torah and spiritual pursuit. They are constantly in heavenly involvement and absolutly nothing else. Their entire existence evolves around the axis of Torah.
On the other side of the spectrum there are those Tzakdikim that that are like a palm-tree: their not devoting 100% of their time to Torah study. They are not constantly involved with heaven. In fact they devote some of their time, effort, money and abilities to help other people. They bear fruits -- they're actions and interactions with other individuals -- in the way of spiritual and material help are indeed the "fruits" they produce. The palm-tree tzadikim reach out to the simple folk. Those who consume their fruits indeed gain both physical and spiritual sustenance, vitality and strength.
Though this outreach may come at the expense of these palm-tree tzadikim, because they certainly don't have all the Torah study that the ceder tzadikim have.
Back to the problem at hand:
Moshe sees in the 10 other spies that they are indeed kosher, as Rashi explains, and that they're indeed tzadikim of the ceder variety: they much rather stay in the desert and live a supernatural life where food is miraculously provided daily, the clothing grows with the person wearing them, the clouds of glory provide divine protection and a person is free to pursuit spirituality to their heart's content without interference from the physical realm. On the other hand the Land of Israel represents, to them, a spiritual decent because: a person would have to be involved in manual labor to work the land, go to the marketplace to buy and sell, cook, put food on the table, clean after the meal, change diapers, take the donkey in for an oil-change, take the kids to sand-hockey and be otherwise involved in earthy matters, leaving less time for spiritual pursuits.
Moshe wants Hoshea to become a palm-tree tzadik, on the other hand. Moshe reasons that it's not enough to be all spiritual and lead a completely spiritual life, for if that was the case, the Jewish nation would have not received physical bodies and a Torah that affects (and indeed utilizes and refines) the physical world. For Torah to be truly applied in one's day-to-day life, one must infuse the day-to-day mundane life with Torah -- that is the true purpose of receiving the Torah at Mt. Sinai.
Retrospectively we see that Moshe was correct: the 10 spies were punished severely for trying to hijack the divine plan (i.e., to stay in the desert and live an exclusively spiritual life) while Yehoshuah (nee: Hoshea) is chosen by the Almighty as Moshe's replacement and indeed the person who will eventually lead the Jewish people into the Land of Israel. There, in the Land of Israel, under Yehoshua's leadership the Divine Will and Divine Purpose of giving of the Torah (and indeed creation as a whole) can be fulfilled, specifically by affecting, utilizing and refining the mundane with the light of Torah.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)